Be afraid, be very afraid

February 10, 2005 at 8:21 am | In Uncategorized |

Is this fear-mongering to drive up membership renewals? Is there really something “emergency” going on here? Can we live in a state of emergency all the time?

Outraged that the Attorney-General nominee argued that prohibitions against torture were quaint? Concerned that police surveillance of anti-war groups has chilled speech opposing the war in Iraq? Worried that your neighbor’s son, or perhaps your own, will be interrogated by law enforcement because of his race or ethnicity? Fearful that your daughter may be stripped of the right to choose lawful - and safe - reproductive health services? Suspicious that all of our rights have been eroded by the government’s focus on “national security” at the expense of everything else?

If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, please join activists from around the state for an Emergency Summit of ACLU of Illinois Members Committed to Defending our Constitution.

  • Efforts to impose criminal penalties against who provide life saving reproductive health care to patients;
  • funding of religious organizations that discriminate against applicants for jobs and social services on the basis of , marital status, orientation, gender, status or any other characteristic that a religious organization finds objectionable;
  • Broad authority for intrusive investigations of average Americans based on their religious and political beliefs, without any indication of criminal behavior - in contravention of the 4th Amendment to the United States .

Of course I’m glad the is working on all of these issues, but I’m concerned about the effects of using as a motivator. Comments?

3 Comments

  1. You nailed it Ted. This is the most absolutely dead-on-target post I have read in months.

    Fantastic.

    Comment by Chris Corrigan — February 11, 2005 #

  2. You’re fear-mongering yourself with this post, so that makes you a hypocrite.

    I get really tired of leftists whining the US is turning into some kind of 1984 dictatorship.

    Wanna see a place where opposition leaders and dissidents are assassinated in broad daylight and the constitution is replaced by an undemocratic bureaucracy? Try the Netherlands…

    Anyway, the Attorney-General nominee never ‘argued that prohibitions against torture were quaint’. That’s a distortion of a piece of technical legal advice, taken out of context and spun to fit the Democrats’ fear-mongering storyline.

    How did American leftists end up as apologists and defenders of islamists and fascists?

    Comment by Peter Verkooijen — May 12, 2005 #

  3. I’m fear-mongering? Hmm. Not sure where you get that from. This post is criticizing the ACLU for using fear as a weapon. What am I using fear to accomplish? If you’re criticizing the ACLU for their words that I quoted, than I believe you’re agreeing with me. Thanks for visiting!

    Comment by ted — May 13, 2005 #

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^