A Public Service

Posted: March 25th, 2007 | Author: ted | Filed under: the Commons, transportation | 4 Comments »

A while back, I posted about how our basic infrastructure should be provided collectively. I was speaking about trains, but could’ve just as easily been talking about overnight bus service in Winnepeg, or community wireless internet. We don’t expect our police department to cover 50% of it’s budget by writing tickets (in Chicago the tickets are mostly written by the Department of Revenue anyway), nor do we expect the Fire Department to cover it’s own budget. Streetlights don’t pay for themselves? Why do we require Amtrak to cover it’s own bills? Highways certainly don’t pay for themselves. We subsidize the heck out of both roads and fuel. Anyway, just ranting again. Public service means by and for the public.

Sharing is Caring:

4 Comments on “A Public Service”

1 Nick said at 5:16 am on March 25th, 2007:
Very true — it’s interesting what our elected officials deem to be true public (and thus completely subsidized) versus semi-public (and thus with a fare or other restrictions attached) services.

Thanks for the link.
2 M a r k D i l l e y said at 9:43 pm on March 25th, 2007:
A Public Service � Humanize the Earth!

“Why do we require Amtrak to cover it
3 Brian Kerr | links for 2007-03-27 said at 11:37 pm on March 26th, 2007:
[...] Humanize the Earth! | A Public Service “Why do we require Amtrak to cover it�s own bills? Highways certainly don�t pay for themselves. We subsidize the heck out of both roads and fuel.” (tags: chicago chicagoted public transportation collective ownership amtrak) [...]
4 Michael Maranda said at 3:11 am on April 8th, 2007:
Have been thinking that we need Hooze/NICK equivalents to follow the subsidy of different practices in our society. http://www.hooze.org (as ted knows) is a project using GrassCommons.org’s wiki-database tool WagN

Hooze – for who’s behind a product… how about who’s behind an industry?