Silo’s Message - The Book (V. Intimation of Meaning)

February 18, 2008 at 9:30 pm | In book, meaning in life, humanize, personal work | 1 Comment

I have read Silo’s Message many times, mostly in pieces. I have decided to publish it here, in it’s entirely. The message is in 3 parts, The Book, The Experience and the Path. Today is chapter five of The Book.

V. Intimation of Meaning
The third day.

  1. At times I have anticipated events that later took place.
  2. At times I have grasped a distant thought.
  3. At times I have described places I have never been.
  4. At times I have recounted exactly what took place in my absence.
  5. At times an immense joy has surprised me.
  6. At times total comprehension has overwhelmed me.
  7. At times a perfect communion with everything has filled me with ecstasy.
  8. At times I have broken through my reveries and seen reality in a new way.
  9. At times I have seen something for the first time yet recognized it as though I had seen it before.

…And all this has made me think. It is clear to me that without these experiences I could not have emerged from the non-meaning.

see also: The Book (IV. Dependence)

Silo’s Message - The Book (IV. Dependence)

February 6, 2008 at 5:19 pm | In book, meaning in life, humanize, personal work | 1 Comment

I have read Silo’s Message many times, mostly in pieces. I have decided to publish it here, in it’s entirely, in serial form. The message is in 3 parts, The Book, The Experience and the Path. Today is chapter four of The Book.

IV. Dependence
The second day.

  1. Nothing that I do, feel, or think depends on me.
  2. I am mutable and depend on the action of my surroundings. When I want to change my environment or my “I,” it is my environment that ends up changing me. Then I seek the city or nature, social redemption or a new struggle in order to justify my existence. In every case it is my environment that leads me to choose one attitude or another. In this way, my interests and my surroundings leave me here.
  3. I say, then, that it does not matter who or what decides. I say on these occasions that I have to live since I am in the situation of living. I say all this, but there is nothing that justifies it. I can make a decision, hesitate, or remain where I am. In any case, one thing is only provisionally better than another; ultimately there is no better or worse.
  4. If someone tells me that those who do not eat die, I will answer that this is indeed so, and that, spurred by their needs, they are compelled to eat. But I will not add that the struggle to eat justifies one’s existence—nor will I say that this struggle is bad. I will simply say that all of this concerns an individual or collective fact related to the need for subsistence, but that it has no meaning in the moment that the last battle is lost.
  5. I will say, moreover, that I feel solidarity with the struggle of the poor, the exploited, and the persecuted. I will say that I feel “fulfilled” in this identification, but I understand that these feelings do not justify anything.

see also: The Book (III. Non-Meaning)

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^